HIPDS学术评审服务由学会专业委员会体系中的学术评审委员会组织实施。医创研究院作为相关成果整理、课题支持与转化咨询的平台，为申请人提供材料规范、项目衔接和成果梳理支持；评审标准制定、专家遴选和评审结论仍由学术评审委员会独立负责。
HIPDS academic review services are administered by the Academic Review Committee within the Society's professional committee system. The HIPDS Research Institute supports applicants with documentation standards, project coordination, and outcome organisation as a platform for research support and translation consultation; review standards, reviewer selection, and final review conclusions remain the independent responsibility of the Academic Review Committee.
自评审体系建立以来，委员会已累计完成超过1200项学术评审，涵盖临床医学、基础研究、技术创新和成果转化等多个维度。学术评审委员会由30余位常设资深专家组成，并根据具体评审方向从亚太地区外部评审专家名录中邀请相关专家参与，确保每项评审兼具专业性、独立性和可追溯性。
Since the establishment of the review system, the Committee has completed over 1,200 academic reviews across clinical medicine, basic research, technological innovation, and translational outcomes. The Academic Review Committee comprises more than 30 standing senior experts and invites additional domain experts from the Asia-Pacific external reviewer roster according to the review topic, ensuring that each review is professional, independent, and traceable.
评审采用国际通行的同行评议模式，结合双盲评审与公开答辩机制，最大程度保障过程的客观性与透明度。所有评审结论均经多轮审核复核，评审证书可在HIPDS官方平台在线验证，已获亚太地区多家医疗机构和医学教育机构的广泛认可。
The review process adopts the internationally recognised peer-review model, incorporating double-blind review and open-defence mechanisms to maximise objectivity and transparency. All review conclusions undergo multiple rounds of verification. Review certificates are verifiable online through the HIPDS official platform and have gained broad recognition from numerous healthcare and medical education institutions across the Asia-Pacific region.
依托医创研究院的研究协作网络，申请人可在正式评审前获得成果整理、数据规范和转化路径梳理支持。上述支持不介入评审结论，学术评审委员会仍按照既定标准开展独立评审，共同服务于医疗创新成果的价值发现与推广应用。
Through the research collaboration network of the HIPDS Research Institute, applicants may receive support in outcome documentation, data standardisation, and translation pathway preparation before formal review. This support does not influence review conclusions; the Academic Review Committee conducts independent review according to established standards, jointly serving the discovery and promotion of healthcare innovation value.
四大专业评审方向，全面覆盖医学研究与实践
Four professional review tracks comprehensively covering medical research and practice
面向原创性临床研究论文的专业评审服务，涵盖随机对照试验、队列研究、病例对照研究、横断面研究及系统综述/Meta分析等各类研究设计。评审重点关注研究设计的科学性、数据分析的严谨性、结论推导的逻辑性以及临床应用的可行性。学术评审委员会将从选题价值、方法学质量、统计分析、伦理合规和创新程度等五个核心维度进行综合评价，每篇论文由至少3位相关领域专家独立评审，确保评审意见的全面性和专业性。通过评审的优秀论文将获得HIPDS学术评审认证，并有机会推荐至学会合作的学术期刊发表。
A professional review service for original clinical research papers, encompassing randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses. The review focuses on the scientific rigour of research design, the robustness of data analysis, the logical soundness of conclusions, and the feasibility of clinical application. The Academic Review Committee evaluates submissions across five core dimensions: research significance, methodological quality, statistical analysis, ethical compliance, and degree of innovation. Each paper is independently reviewed by at least three domain experts to ensure comprehensive and professional assessment. Outstanding papers that pass the review will receive HIPDS Academic Review certification and may be recommended for publication in the Society's partner academic journals.
专注于临床实践中具有重要教学价值、诊疗创新或罕见疑难特征的病例报告与案例分析。评审着重考察病例的完整性与真实性、诊疗思路的清晰度与逻辑性、处理方案的合理性与创新性以及对临床实践的启示意义。案例评审不仅关注诊疗结果，更重视临床决策过程中的思维方法论。学术评审委员会将根据病例方向安排具有丰富临床经验的一线专家，提供深入、专业的评审反馈。通过评审的优秀案例将纳入HIPDS临床案例数据库，作为医学继续教育的重要教学资源，持续为医学临床实践贡献价值。
This track focuses on case reports and case analyses from clinical practice that carry significant educational value, demonstrate diagnostic and therapeutic innovation, or present rare and complex characteristics. The review examines the completeness and authenticity of case documentation, the clarity and logical coherence of clinical reasoning, the appropriateness and innovativeness of management strategies, and the implications for clinical practice. Case reviews place equal emphasis on clinical outcomes and the methodology of decision-making processes. The Academic Review Committee assigns frontline clinicians with extensive practical experience to provide in-depth, expert feedback grounded in real-world practice. Outstanding cases that pass the review will be incorporated into the HIPDS Clinical Case Database as an important educational resource for continuing medical education.
针对医疗器械、诊断技术、治疗方法及数字健康解决方案等领域的技术创新成果进行专业评审。评审标准涵盖技术原创性、临床适用性、安全性论证、成本效益分析和市场转化潜力等关键要素。评审过程引入跨学科评审机制，邀请临床医学、生物医学工程、卫生经济学等不同领域的专家共同参与，从多角度对技术创新成果进行全方位评估。对于具有显著转化潜力的创新项目，学会将提供后续的产学研对接服务，协助申请者推进成果从实验室到临床应用的转化进程，真正实现技术创新的临床价值。
This track provides professional review of technological innovations in medical devices, diagnostic technologies, therapeutic approaches, and digital health solutions. Review criteria encompass technological originality, clinical applicability, safety validation, cost-effectiveness analysis, and market translation potential. The process incorporates an interdisciplinary review mechanism, inviting experts from clinical medicine, biomedical engineering, health economics, and related fields to conduct a multi-dimensional, comprehensive evaluation. For innovative projects with significant translational potential, the Society offers follow-up industry-academia-research matchmaking services, supporting applicants in advancing the translation of outcomes from laboratory to clinical application.
聚焦已初步完成或正在推进临床转化的研究成果，重点评估转化路径的科学性、转化过程的规范性、临床验证的充分性以及社会经济效益。这一评审类别是HIPDS特色服务之一，体现了学会"转化导向"的核心理念。学术评审委员会综合考量成果的临床需求匹配度、知识产权保护状况、监管审批进展和可持续发展前景，为申请者提供系统化的评审意见与改进建议。成功通过转化成果评审的项目将获得HIPDS转化认证标识，并优先获得学会资源支持，包括专家咨询、合作机构对接和学术推广等增值服务。
This track focuses on research outcomes that have been preliminarily completed or are actively undergoing clinical translation, with particular emphasis on evaluating the scientific soundness of the translational pathway, the standardisation of the translational process, the adequacy of clinical validation, and the socioeconomic benefits. This review category is a signature HIPDS service, embodying the Society's core philosophy of "translation-oriented" development. The Academic Review Committee considers the alignment of outcomes with clinical needs, the status of intellectual property protection, regulatory approval progress, and long-term sustainability. Projects that successfully pass the Translational Outcomes Review will receive the HIPDS Translational Certification Mark and be accorded priority access to Society resources, including expert consultation, partner institution matchmaking, and academic promotion services.
严谨规范的七步评审机制，保障评审质量
A rigorous seven-step review mechanism ensuring the highest standards of quality
申请者通过HIPDS官方平台在线提交评审申请，上传研究成果材料、个人学术简历及相关支撑文件。系统将自动进行格式审查并生成申请编号。
Applicants submit their review applications online through the HIPDS official platform, uploading research materials, academic curricula vitae, and supporting documents. The system automatically conducts a format review and generates an application reference number.
运营中心秘书处在5个工作日内完成形式审查，确认材料的完整性和合规性，并根据研究方向提交学术评审委员会安排对应专家评审。
The Operations Centre Secretariat completes a formal review within five working days, verifies the completeness and compliance of submitted materials, and forwards the application to the Academic Review Committee for assignment to appropriate expert reviewers based on the research direction.
评审管理系统根据申请者的研究领域，自动匹配具有相关专业背景的评审专家。每项评审由至少3位独立专家负责，确保评审的多角度覆盖和利益回避。
The review management system automatically matches reviewers with relevant disciplinary expertise to each application. Each submission is assigned to at least three independent experts, ensuring multi-perspective coverage and appropriate conflict-of-interest avoidance.
评审专家在不知晓申请者身份的情况下，依据标准化评审量表对成果进行独立评分，并撰写详细的评审意见，包括学术价值评估和改进建议。
Reviewers, without knowledge of the applicant's identity, independently score submissions using standardised review rubrics and provide detailed written assessments, including academic value evaluation and recommendations for improvement.
运营中心秘书处汇总各评审专家的评分和意见，并提交学术评审委员会复核；如专家评分差异超过规定阈值，将启动追加评审程序，确保评审结论的一致性和可靠性。
The Operations Centre Secretariat consolidates reviewer scores and opinions and submits them to the Academic Review Committee for verification. If score variance exceeds the prescribed threshold, an additional review procedure is initiated to ensure consistency and reliability.
评审结果通过系统通知申请者，包含详细的评审报告、评分明细和专家建议。申请者如对结果有异议，可在15个工作日内提交复议申请。
Review outcomes are communicated to applicants through the system, including a detailed review report, score breakdown, and expert recommendations. Applicants who wish to contest the outcome may submit an appeal within 15 working days.
通过评审的成果将获颁HIPDS学术评审证书（电子版与纸质版），评审信息同步录入学会学术数据库，证书编号可在官方平台在线查验。
Outcomes that pass the review will be issued a HIPDS Academic Review Certificate (in both electronic and print formats). Review records are simultaneously entered into the Society's academic database, and certificate numbers are verifiable online through the official platform.
汇聚亚太顶尖医学专家，构筑权威评审阵容
Bringing together leading medical experts from the Asia-Pacific to form an authoritative review panel
HIPDS学术评审委员会（Academic Review Committee）是学会专业委员会体系中负责学术评审工作的常设委员会，负责制定和维护评审标准、组织专家评审、监督评审流程质量并审议重大评审事项。委员会由主任委员、副主任委员和委员组成，成员来自临床医学、基础研究、技术创新、公共卫生和成果转化等相关领域。
The HIPDS Academic Review Committee is the standing committee within the Society's professional committee system responsible for academic review work. It establishes and maintains review standards, organises expert review, oversees review process quality, and deliberates on significant review matters. The Committee consists of a Chair, Vice Chairs, and members from clinical medicine, basic research, technology innovation, public health, and translational outcomes.
委员会实行任期制管理，每届任期三年，可连任一届。委员遴选严格执行学术标准，候选人须具备扎实的专业资历、持续的研究或临床实践记录，以及在各自领域的代表性学术贡献。委员会定期召开工作会议，审议评审政策和重大事项。
The Committee operates under a term-based governance system, with each term lasting three years and a maximum of one renewal. Member selection follows strict academic standards; candidates must have solid professional qualifications, a sustained record of research or clinical practice, and representative academic contributions in their respective fields. The Committee convenes working meetings regularly to deliberate on review policies and significant matters.
为保障评审质量，委员会建立了评审专家培训、回避申报和绩效复核机制。所有评审专家在正式参与评审前须完成标准化培训课程，并通过评审能力考核；委员会每年对评审专家进行复核，根据评估结果动态维护评审专家名录。
To safeguard review quality, the Committee maintains reviewer training, conflict-of-interest declaration, and performance verification mechanisms. All expert reviewers must complete standardised training and pass a reviewer competency assessment before participating in formal review. The Committee conducts annual verification of reviewers and updates the reviewer roster based on the results.
涉及伦理合规、利益冲突或学术诚信争议的事项，由学术评审委员会按程序提交伦理审查委员会或相关专业委员会复核。所有评审活动均须遵守《HIPDS学术评审行为准则》，确保评审工作的公正性和透明度。
Matters involving ethical compliance, conflicts of interest, or academic integrity disputes are referred by the Academic Review Committee to the Ethics Review Committee or the relevant professional committee for verification under established procedures. All review activities must comply with the HIPDS Code of Conduct for Academic Review to ensure impartiality and transparency.
专业评审团队，严谨评审流程，助力您的学术发展
A professional review team and rigorous review process to support your academic advancement
申请学术评审Apply for Academic Review